HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8603
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20231113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '24 at 15:30
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 152 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 471 48% 386 Pts	64-Core 569 35% 569 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% HP(103C 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.78 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31% Below average	Lighting 39.5 Reflection 47.8 Parallax 34.5 32% 40.6 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 44.4 Splatting 45.4 29% 33.1 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 72%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv128g TOSHIBA 128GB 3,266 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 508 Write 67.4 Mixed 127 50% 234 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 12.7 45% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 83.2 DQ Mixed 49.3 61% 110 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 135%
WD Game Drive 2TB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2TB free Firmware: 1003 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 254 Write 288 Mixed 272 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 13.9 47% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 119 88% 115 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 89%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 908GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 139 Write 134 Mixed 29 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3200, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 22.9 80% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 19.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 87 46% 87 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	144	17.2"	1280 720	CMN175D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx Builds (Compare 1,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,298x
Core i9-9880HIntelBench 79%, 11,095 samples	113x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	73x

GPU
GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples	454x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	415x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	321x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	261x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	208x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	98x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	384x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	121x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16