HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DA
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 00:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 231
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 679
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 84DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 6.2
5% 14.4 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.3
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 191 188 181 178 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,716
Write 1,180
Mixed 861
SusWrite 214
220% 993 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 63.7
213% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 872
676% 924 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 190%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
374GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,423
Write 7421
Mixed 7270
1,648% 7,371 MB/s
4K Read 486
4K Write 289
4K Mixed 325
1,306% 367 MB/s
DQ Read 1,236
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 994
778% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 23.9
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 26
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback