PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus WS X299 SAGE/10G (all builds) |
Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200110 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Jan 02 '24 at 22:05 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
80%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gainward(10B0 1B06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
107%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 230 218 216 212 197 MB/s
|
94.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
210GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 103 102 106 106 MB/s
|
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
261GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 45 45 46 46 MB/s
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 68 | 55 | 165 | 27" | 1280 720 | ACR052F XB271HU A |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples | 26x |
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples | 22x |
Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3090Nvidia $835Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 24x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 18x |
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $1,155 |