Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

16 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211129
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '24 at 14:57
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 91 1-Core 121 2-Core 243 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 661 72% 572 Pts	64-Core 660 41% 660 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44% Average	Lighting 54.2 Reflection 83 Parallax 53.2 44% 63.5 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 50.2 Splatting 47.2 44% 54.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 6.7 222 321 6.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 423 Write 343 Mixed 330 SusWrite 95.1 66% 298 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 22 88% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 0.8 48% 118 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 102%
Generic External 2TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 333GB free, PID 3920 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 37 40 39 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	21% Poor	Read 34 Write 37.3 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 38.1 48% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2666 1x8GB 764 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 10.2 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 11.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	21.5"	1280 720	GSM58D7 IPS224

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	394x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	343x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	147x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	118x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	84x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	74x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	130x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	49x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	62x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16