Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO VIUU4
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateJan 02 '24 at 11:14
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 169
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 386
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39B9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.93 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Legend(17AA 39B9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.75
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 49.7
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 54.2
40% 55.4 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 57
47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512 512GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1345 1731 1603 612 496 507 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,842
Write 1,667
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 1,049
348% 1,551 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 56.1
178% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 639
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 560
423% 570 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 219%
Great: 380%
Kimmidi TB900 SSD 256GB
60GB free
Firmware: S0924A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 25 35 43 2.4 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 328
Write 321
Mixed 287
SusWrite 57.2
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 16.2
71% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 1.3
61% 141 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 8A26 K000MD48S 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.5% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15D2
Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback