Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FB
Memory	0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	18.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '24 at 07:32
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Memory 34.2 1-Core 32.7 2-Core 71 27% 46 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 214 22% 176 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 119F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.46% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2 Parallax 5 2% 2.93 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 8.9 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.46% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 390 256 31 28 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 881 Write 651 Mixed 609 SusWrite 211 131% 588 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 22.2 83% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 213 172% 244 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GB 1,799 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 7.1 23% 8.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 0.8 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	11	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	122x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	30x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	15x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	117x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	50x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	23x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	19x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	13x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	66x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	33x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16