MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '24 at 17:14
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 178
2-Core 346
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,339
120% 1,012 Pts
64-Core 2,340
145% 2,340 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 214
Parallax 208
192% 219 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 157
Splatting 138
132% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 157%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 32 64 45 46 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.1% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 104
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 48.9
13% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 10.6
68% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 0.2
34% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 86%
SMI DISK 512GB
134GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 414 33 105 73 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 527
Write 453
Mixed 416
SusWrite 192
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 29.1
147% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 1.2
35% 92.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
65GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 49 49 49 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 74.5
Write 86.7
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 49
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
166% Outstanding
MC Read 119
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 36.4
187% 65.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 35.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 166%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 100 34" 1280 720 MSI1462 MSI MAG341CQ
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $678
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback