Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210107
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJan 01 '24 at 05:35
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 721
63% 537 Pts
64-Core 1,657
103% 1,657 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 62.7
52% 66.3 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 56.1
51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP230 512GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1726 456 267 272 268 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 1,820
Mixed 1,520
SusWrite 540
298% 1,320 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 50.6
163% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 396
285% 370 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 156%
Great: 284%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
448GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 135 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 146
Write 122
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 135
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 1x31GB
1 of 24 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 23" 1280 720 GSM59CA 2D HD LG TV
Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback