User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIPASON
MotherboardIPASON 3250U-ITX
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '24 at 02:07
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 144
54% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 179
20% 158 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 131
Parallax 175
72% 131 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 90.6
Splatting 157
118% 144 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pd350 512GB M2(nvme) 512GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220902a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 520 614 683 707 808 548 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 897
Write 935
Mixed 670
SusWrite 647
177% 787 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 17.9
68% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 190
127% 152 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 250%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
553GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 147 146 153 159 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 154
Write 150
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 151
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 11.8
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 38 194 27 165 27" 1280 720 ONN0000 100094417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback