PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110302 |
Uptime | 2.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 31 '23 at 16:10 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
73.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 74 69 69 69 71 MB/s
|
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
191GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 145 147 147 149 MB/s
|
76.8%
Very good
|
|||
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
7GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 40 39 40 MB/s
|
27.3%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
6GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 70 74 82 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-149.A01LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 21.7" | 1280 720 | GSM5B55 LG FULL HD |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 446x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 358x |
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 199x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 118x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 103x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $666 |