Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S752

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK S752  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB23F
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 14:09
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 102
51% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 114
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Chuxia 256GB 256GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0630B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 356 354 374 393 387 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.9% Very good
Read 377
Write 331
Mixed 313
SusWrite 372
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 21.5
98% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 46.8
77% 148 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 144%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
271GB free
Firmware: AX001F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 95 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 77.5
Write 91.8
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 95.9
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 0443 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 12 68 55 60 14" 1280 720 FUJ5612
Typical LIFEBOOK S752 Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S752

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback