Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi Ultimate  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 23:52
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 169
2-Core 334
103% 195 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 874
94% 746 Pts
64-Core 1160
72% 1160 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 5050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 237
Reflection 212
Parallax 202
193% 217 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 160
Splatting 131
141% 179 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 160%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,382
Write 995
Mixed 1,126
259% 1,168 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 87.3
288% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 1,013
DQ Mixed 1119
844% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Phison SU30-C 480GB
264GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 389 396 398 399 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 335
Write 391
Mixed 320
SusWrite 395
82% 360 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 146
109% 144 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.8
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 39.3
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5C0A LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical X470 Taichi Ultimate Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback