Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi Ultimate  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 23:29
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 171
2-Core 329
102% 193 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 934
94% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 184
Parallax 191
165% 192 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 139
Splatting 115
121% 154 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 140%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,375
Write 973
Mixed 1,127
257% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 86.9
285% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 1,024
DQ Mixed 1119
845% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Phison SU30-C 480GB
264GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 394 395 394 397 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 321
Write 245
Mixed 302
SusWrite 394
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 25
84% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 76.8
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 101
86% 123 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.5
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 37.5
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 0P 5R 2G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 31% 52 218 60 165 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5C0A LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical X470 Taichi Ultimate Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback