Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive418% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory121.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230118
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 21:46
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 170
2-Core 344
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 980
101% 814 Pts
64-Core 1097
68% 1097 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87DB) ≥ 4GB; ASUS TURBO GEFORCE RTX 3070 V2 8GB GDDR6
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 219
Parallax 208
192% 221 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 156
Splatting 139
133% 166 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 157%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
819GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3238 1974 1975 1978 1971 1987 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
418% Outstanding
Read 3,260
Write 3695
Mixed 3,210
SusWrite 2,187
696% 3,088 MB/s
4K Read 77.5
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 106
356% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 953
720% 965 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 418%
Great: 488%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
667GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 465 359 335 337 336 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 329
Write 464
Mixed 375
SusWrite 382
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 40.2
145% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 215
161% 215 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 104%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1353 307 308 308 307 307 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2529
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,060
SusWrite 482
306% 1,386 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 84.1
307% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,302
DQ Mixed 1,002
794% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 276%
Great: 280%
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
233GB free
Firmware: CS30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1159 1109 424 263 262 261 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,439
Write 998
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 580
234% 1,047 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 81.2
287% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 76.3
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 89.7
124% 213 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 194%
Great: 214%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 141
Write 141
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 115
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 114 115 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 116
Write 111
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 113
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL32G36C16U4B.M16FB1 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
109% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42.6
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 34.4
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 44.9
102% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 11 60 34" 3440 1369 SAM0BFD SE790C
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback