TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_F1502ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_F1502ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1502ZA
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 18:28
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 172
2-Core 310
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 777
79% 637 Pts
64-Core 1000
62% 1000 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 79.6%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1D52) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 24.7
17% 23.2 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 19.4
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 17.4%
 Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 964 946 1086 938 1189 1223 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1845
Write 1,200
Mixed 994
SusWrite 1,058
284% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 69.2
231% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 408
290% 372 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑
This bench: 226%
 Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 26.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 77.3%
 Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0946
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_F1502ZA Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_F1502ZA

CPU
Core i3-1220PIntelBench 71%, 336 samples45x
Core i7-1255UIntelBench 65%, 11,564 samples38x
Core i5-1235UIntelBench 60%, 8,532 samples26x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 13%, 18,007 samples59x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 10%, 2,559 samples46x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples18x
SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples66x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples32x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA256TFK 256GBNvmeBench 152%, 569 samples12x
RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GBMicronBench 35%, 2,450 samples25x
M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 70%, 1,158 samples22x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GBMicronBench 73%, 1,021 samples14x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback