Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive507% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 13:59
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700k VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 267
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 692
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 111
Parallax 103
91% 109 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 102
Splatting 99.2
81% 98.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
507% Outstanding
Read 6,230
Write 60.4
Mixed 119
SusWrite 44.7
336% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 631
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 5.5
965% 213 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 507%
Great: 410%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
317GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 347 348 354 340 348 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,729
Write 1,530
Mixed 1,879
SusWrite 346
307% 1,371 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 80.4
264% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,145
DQ Write 950
DQ Mixed 1,028
775% 1041 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 219%
Great: 365%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
68GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 342 344 359 352 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 478
Mixed 403
SusWrite 344
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 58.9
194% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129
4.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 140 140 141 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
782GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 102 102 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 98.6
Write 96.6
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 102
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 27.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 26.9" 1280 720 BNQ7F9D BenQ SW271C
Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $764
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback