bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 01:55
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 159
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 436
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Lighting 93
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 84.5
76% 88.9 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 82.6
Splatting 74
73% 91.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 176 116 142 100 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 414
Write 242
Mixed 246
SusWrite 129
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 13
72% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 23.1
42% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 74%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
335GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 84 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 85.6
Write 81
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 83.1
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-026.A00LF 9965525-058.A00LF 9965525-026.A00LF 9965525-058.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 9 60 27" 1920 1057 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback