Asrock Z790-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 298%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 356%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics248% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z790-C  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '23 at 18:25
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$275
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 218
2-Core 440
127% 248 Pts
4-Core 881
8-Core 1,612
149% 1,247 Pts
64-Core 3,152
195% 3,152 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 125%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
MSI(1462 513E) ≥ 4GB; G407TV2XW12C
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
248% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 354
Parallax 419
293% 377 fps
MRender 500
Gravity 310
Splatting 223
268% 344 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 248%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M450 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2510 2629 1623 139 156 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 1,909
Write 2,683
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 1,198
420% 1,859 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 286
4K Mixed 89.2
350% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1613
DQ Write 1,040
DQ Mixed 1,326
989% 1,326 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 315%
Great: 351%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
114GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 243 252 250 248 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 419
Write 459
Mixed 387
SusWrite 261
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 40.5
136% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 321
240% 320 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
82GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 462 276 244 238 236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 244
Mixed 264
SusWrite 323
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 40.3
142% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 320
238% 314 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 99%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
4GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 40 43 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 36.7
Write 43
Mixed 40
SusWrite 41.5
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 153 153 155 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 152
Write 120
Mixed 108
SusWrite 152
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 101%
ST320006 41AS 2TB
416GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
Read 52.5
Write 33.7
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 41.2
49% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
68% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake Co Ltd RG34D516GX2-5600C36B 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
183% Outstanding
MC Read 76.9
MC Write 72.4
MC Mixed 67.6
207% 72.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 52.3
SC Mixed 30
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 158%
This bench: 183%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 48 60 31.5" 1280 720 PHLC180 PHL 328E9Q
Typical Z790-C Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 452%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 597%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z790-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,136
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback