ADD TO PC
BUILD

Notebook P65_P67RGRERA

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Notebook P65_P67RGRERA (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65_P67RGRERA
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160105
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '18 at 12:41
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 181 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 548 59% 467 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M 10,379 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Clevo(1558 6542) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	43% Average	Lighting 52.9 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 53.4 43% 53.7 fps	MRender 56.2 Gravity 48.8 Splatting 51.6 43% 52.2 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 1,196 Write 559 Mixed 822 189% 859 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 45.1 186% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 424 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 159 159% 262 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 243%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 531GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 125 125 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 925 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 10596 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 921 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 15 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 73 73 272405 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 231929085988 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	54.3% Above average	Read 100 Write 89.6 Mixed 94.8 72% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.16 52% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G1A1 M471A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23.4 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 23.4 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P65_P67RGRERA Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Notebook P65_P67RGRERA

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	157x
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	24x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	55x
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	46x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	40x

SSD
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	25x
850 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 110%, 25,072 samples	14x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $250Bench 199%, 40,327 samples	6x

RAM
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples	27x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 6,021 samples	15x
HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 2,917 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback