TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 81LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81LK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '23 at 05:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300HF
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 132
60% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 349
36% 291 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 64.6%
 Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A41) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 50.4
46% 56 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 49.9
Splatting 48.7
39% 46.9 fps
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 43.3%
 Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 110 94 92 93 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 752
Write 125
Mixed 198
SusWrite 102
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 34.4
139% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 165
128% 178 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 86.9%
 Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-S16G-2400 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 44.6%
 Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05E5
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 81LK Builds (Compare 6,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81LK

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples3,118x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,447x
Core i5-9300HFIntelBench 73%, 6,965 samples1,412x
GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples2,870x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples2,271x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples1,188x
SSD
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GBBench 86%, 6,231 samples944x
PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512G-1101 512GBWDCBench 156%, 10,396 samples504x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples470x
RAM
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 16,227 samples1,332x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples1,095x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples869x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback