Acer Nitro N50-610

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Acer Nitro N50-610 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Nitro N50-610
Memory	1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '23 at 22:42
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 90.9 1-Core 119 2-Core 212 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 749 68% 571 Pts	64-Core 938 58% 938 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.4% Below average	Lighting 47.9 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 38.3 39% 50.1 fps	MRender 42.4 Gravity 47.9 Splatting 45.6 37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB 6,851 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: P6MA000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,199 Write 1,295 Mixed 992 260% 1,162 MB/s	4K Read 48.4 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 63.8 209% 71.4 MB/s	DQ Read 874 DQ Write 648 DQ Mixed 313 356% 612 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 301%
WD WD20EARX-00PASB0 1TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 688GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 86 85 86 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 84.5 Write 91.3 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 85.2 63% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S1KC-4 2x4GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.2% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 17.6 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 19.4 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	120	24.1"	1280 720	SAM0F90 LC24RG50

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro N50-610 Builds (Compare 3,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-610

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	2,256x
Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	509x
Core i7-10700Intel $231Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	462x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1,366x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	840x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	228x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	462x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples	364x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	169x

RAM
ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 12GBKingstonBench 56%, 475 samples	197x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	195x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	164x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16