Acer Nitro N50-620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-620  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-620
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 15:28
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 153
2-Core 302
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 870
91% 729 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Sapphire(174B A538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.80
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.4% Very good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 90.4
Parallax 82.7
72% 87.3 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 72.4
70% 87.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GD3JX016N 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,436
Write 1,938
Mixed 1,510
435% 1,961 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 91.7
305% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,182
DQ Write 815
DQ Mixed 940
718% 979 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 287%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
907GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 183
Write 159
Mixed 103
110% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S1KC-4 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 18.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 26.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0501 SAMSUNG
Typical Nitro N50-620 Builds (Compare 2,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

System: Acer Nitro N50-620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $453
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback