Asus K56CB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K56CB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K56CB
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 22:01
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 97.2
51% 79 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 139
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1587) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.63 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 211 135 140 129 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 422
Write 362
Mixed 226
SusWrite 166
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 24.9
89% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 188
148% 208 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 130%
Sandisk U100 24GB
4GB free
Firmware: CS.56.02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 320
Write 81.3
Mixed 58.9
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 8.9
32% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 12.2
11% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 60 15.6" 1280 720 LGD032E
Typical K56CB Builds (Compare 481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K56CB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback