Lenovo 4157JP7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4157JP7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 11:14
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3503-$32
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 61.4
44% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 69.7
8-Core 76.3
10% 73 Pts
64-Core 95
6% 95 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9
Parallax 4.8
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 6.9
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 186 52 71 115 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.5% Poor
Read 193
Write 167
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 109
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1
28% 8.53 MB/s
DQ Read 72.7
DQ Write 46.9
DQ Mixed 37.8
34% 52.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
465GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 111 116 118 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 114
Write 115
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 6.7
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 46 60 21.5" 1920 1017 SAM092D T22B300
Typical 4157JP7 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4157JP7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback