Lenovo 82AU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220905
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 09:51
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 88.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 233
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 670
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3A42) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.67% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.2 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.67%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,156
Write 1,995
Mixed 1,854
447% 2,002 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 73.7
240% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 841
DQ Mixed 933
698% 932 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 389%
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
64GB free
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,084
Write 1949
Mixed 1,288
394% 1,774 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 72.1
237% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 935
DQ Mixed 1,002
743% 981 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 9905624-054.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 20.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 20.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD066D
Typical 82AU Builds (Compare 1,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82AU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback