PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1998 |
Memory | 19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141211 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 26 '23 at 02:22 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
60.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 3.1 24 3.9 4.5 5.7 MB/s
|
36.2%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
272GB free
Firmware: 1H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 100 102 103 104 MB/s
|
46.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 26 | 186 | 7 | 165 | 27" | 1280 720 | AUS270E VG279QR |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 1,892x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 1,604x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 887x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 3,497x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 436x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 421x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $141 |