Asus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 00:40
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 727
63% 539 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 154
Reflection 220
Parallax 171
126% 182 fps
Gravity 143
Splatting 118
114% 131 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 44 53 38 25 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,407
Write 850
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 90.6
129% 594 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 18.6
116% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 29.4
60% 131 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 242%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
573GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 366 374 382 442 446 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 440
Mixed 385
SusWrite 400
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 43
140% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 121%
Corsair MP600 CORE 2TB
70GB free
Firmware: EGFM52.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,477
Write 3,252
Mixed 1,760
490% 2,163 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 80.6
229% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,246
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 148
342% 721 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 442%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
1GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 439
Mixed 373
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 51.5
175% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 114 115 114 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66% Good
Read 115
Write 99.6
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 114
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 150 151 152 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 83.7
Write 138
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 149
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 90%
USB Flash Disk 0GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.2
7% 5.47 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
31% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 0% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX4M4C3000C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 37.4
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 35.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 13 144 27" 2560 1369 SAM0E16 C27HG7x
Typical ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING Builds (Compare 1,873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback