Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago.

System	Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA760
Memory	22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '23 at 23:49
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 61 2-Core 105 50% 80.1 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 243 26% 208 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop) 45,297 User benchmarks, average bench 114% Device(1A58 3003) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 134 Parallax 117 96% 123 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 85.8 Splatting 88.3 82% 102 fps
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 127%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Wd_black SN750 2TB 4,264 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 112000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 591 604 622 654 708 706 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 1,124 Write 615 Mixed 696 SusWrite 648 172% 770 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 21.4 71% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 139 104% 139 MB/s
Poor: 190% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 347%
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 260GB free Firmware: 21705000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 822 836 869 781 726 615 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 1,059 Write 1,197 Mixed 963 SusWrite 775 225% 999 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 24.3 80% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 144 108% 145 MB/s
Poor: 158% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 283%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16S4B.16FE 2x16GB 490 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	48.9% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 16 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 15.9 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	165	17.2"	1280 720	BOE09D9

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368 Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	239x

GPU
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	83x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	72x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	42x

SSD
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	62x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	49x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	14x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	68x
NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 253 samples	42x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16