Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA760
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '23 at 23:22
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 39 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 45.8 24% 36.1 Pts	4-Core 90.2 8-Core 149 15% 120 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop) 45,297 User benchmarks, average bench 114% Device(1A58 3003) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.2% Below average	Lighting 30 Reflection 76 Parallax 65.5 24% 57.2 fps	MRender 18.3 Gravity 61 Splatting 72.6 44% 50.6 fps
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 127%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Wd_black SN750 2TB 4,264 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 112000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 532 528 532 568 560 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 940 Write 534 Mixed 685 SusWrite 533 150% 673 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 13.4 44% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 81.5 DQ Mixed 97.1 73% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 190% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 347%
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 260GB free Firmware: 21705000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 515 571 558 567 609 598 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Read 1,030 Write 903 Mixed 764 SusWrite 570 183% 817 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 13.4 47% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 85.5 DQ Mixed 101 77% 104 MB/s
Poor: 158% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 283%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16S4B.16FE 2x16GB 490 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 15.4 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 26: 0P 2R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
26%	15%	81	84	16	165	17.2"	1280 720	BOE09D9

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368 Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	238x

GPU
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	83x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	72x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	42x

SSD
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	61x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	49x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	14x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	67x
NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 253 samples	42x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16