Asrock Z790-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 511%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 662%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 134%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics402% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z790-C  (all builds)
Memory52 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 23:48
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$496
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 236
2-Core 472
137% 266 Pts
4-Core 948
8-Core 1,778
163% 1,363 Pts
64-Core 4,171
258% 4,171 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800
Asus(1043 88E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
402% Outstanding
Lighting 658
Reflection 571
Parallax 781
536% 670 fps
MRender 511
Gravity 573
Splatting 301
362% 462 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 402%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 800 GOLD 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1122B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2531 2617 2681 2742 2744 2737 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2082
Write 2721
Mixed 1,689
SusWrite 2,675
519% 2,292 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 54.3
295% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,134
DQ Write 1341
DQ Mixed 742
697% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 217%
This bench: 388%
Great: 394%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
836GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 486 486 483 484 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 482
Mixed 391
SusWrite 485
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 50.6
166% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 257
217% 317 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 65 57 112 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 80.5
Write 109
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 83
66% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Mixed 1
310% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 94%
Seagate ST18000NE000-2YY101 18TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 225 227 227 226 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 93%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0511
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 149 142 141 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 152
Write 126
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 143
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 110%
WD easystore 266A 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 266a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 106 106 104 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 123
Write 106
Mixed 71
SusWrite 106
134% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
210% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
201% Outstanding
MC Read 82.3
MC Write 80.4
MC Mixed 76.1
227% 79.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 54.1
SC Mixed 33.5
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 201%
Great: 205%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F35 U32J59x
Typical Z790-C Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 452%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 597%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z790-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,324
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback