Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150602
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 87 1-Core 104 2-Core 188 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 512 48% 398 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.1% Above average	Lighting 71.7 Reflection 69.4 Parallax 109 58% 83.3 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 82.7 Splatting 53.5 54% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 124 141 177 24 251 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 460 Write 351 Mixed 355 SusWrite 180 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 18 72% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 43.6 54% 95 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 69GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 127 112 122 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 136 Write 96.3 Mixed 74 SusWrite 129 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 603GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 159 160 160 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 159 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 159 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 109%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 882GB free, PID 1048 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 104 105 104 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 104 125% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 32GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.2% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 16.2 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 17.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 0P 5R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
48%	12%	136	229	53	60	27.9"	1280 720	ACR0907 XV282K KV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	133x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	97x
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	36x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16