Lenovo 82MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82MA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210811
Uptime5 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 16:52
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 236
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 460
53% 415 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 114
Parallax 104
86% 108 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 96.6
Splatting 90.1
82% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 97%
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 382F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 18.6
16% 18.6 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 13.8
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L2QFXM7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1265
Write 1,375
Mixed 1,203
287% 1,281 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 65
216% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 702
524% 709 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 227%
PICO 1TB
27GB free
Firmware: 2210
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 338
Write 237
Mixed 265
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 22.7
73% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 117
88% 117 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATS2G64HZ-3G2B1 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 201 26 165 24" 1280 720 AUS24AC VG248
Typical 82MA Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback