Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15-X9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 15-X9  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 15:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 546
59% 467 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 147
Parallax 113
98% 127 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 91.9
86% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1515 1542 1590 1605 818 733 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,916
Write 1,540
Mixed 1,318
SusWrite 1,300
340% 1,519 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 39.2
165% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 563
490% 723 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 242%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4S266M.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 27.3
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 25.2
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27.6" 1920 1080 ONN0000 100027813
Typical GA-AORUS 15-X9 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15-X9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 617% - Outstanding Total price: $4
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback