GPD G1618-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGPD G1618-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1618-04
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 06:40
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 36.3
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 198
57% 111 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 724
67% 558 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.2% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 55.3
25% 44.7 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 23.8
20% 24.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480Y2D100-512G 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.5E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1733 1958 1803 2152 1416 324 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1453
Write 2,263
Mixed 1,660
SusWrite 1,564
394% 1,735 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 54.3
191% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 451
DQ Mixed 242
265% 451 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 237%
Great: 315%
Generic MassStorageClass 248GB
231GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 83 86 85 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
Read 93.1
Write 82
Mixed 82
SusWrite 84.3
115% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 6.3
414% 7.77 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9JCNNNCP3MLCR-N6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 32
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 25
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 229
17% 229 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 6" 1280 720 GPD0598 G1618-04
Typical G1618-04 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: GPD G1618-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback