Acer One 14 Z8-415

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer One 14 Z8-415  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TN1
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230414
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 191
51% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 247
27% 213 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E50 800D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 12.2
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 12.9
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480Y2D100-512G 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 598 716 460 731 772 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 623
Write 636
Mixed 568
SusWrite 618
138% 611 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 34.6
135% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 207
180% 274 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown B44AS8G53222B-TJ17 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 10.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 42 0 13.9" 1280 720 BOE07C9
Typical One 14 Z8-415 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer One 14 Z8-415

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback