Asus H61M-A/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-A/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '23 at 20:58
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220L V2 88 User benchmarks, average bench 56% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 91.4 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 125 61% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 146 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.1% Below average	Lighting 38.1 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 39.2 31% 39.7 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 28.2 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RS-128 128GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 19 51 20 41 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 498 Write 16.5 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 38.5 31% 147 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 10.7 60% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 81.3 DQ Mixed 17.3 34% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 159GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 52 55 53 54 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 46.8 Write 64.3 Mixed 39.4 SusWrite 53.9 38% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB 383 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16.3 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	59	60	21.6"	1280 720	PHLC081 Philips 226VL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-A/USB3 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/USB3

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	26x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	22x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	22x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
HX128GSSDSATA3 128GBBench 60%, 235 samples	4x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	4x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
99U5474-026.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 1,756 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16