TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProBook 470 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProBook 470 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 837F
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221129
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 20:48
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 576
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 75.4%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 837F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7.5
6% 7.23 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.12%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SK hynix PC401 H 256GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 77 74 64 74 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 688
Write 89.7
Mixed 126
SusWrite 75.9
53% 245 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 26.4
104% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 52.3
94% 197 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑
This bench: 75.9%
 Great: 169%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
368GB free
Firmware: JU001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 126 126 118 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 141
Write 115
Mixed 55
SusWrite 124
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 76.5%
 Great: 79%
General UDisk 32GB
5GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 50
33% 50 MB/s
4K Read 541
4K Mixed 0
3,007% 270 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x] Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.7% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 71.7%
 Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 17.1" 1280 720 BOE0694
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ProBook 470 G5 Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 470 G5

CPU
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples316x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples284x
Core i3-7100UIntelBench 43%, 37,239 samples7x
GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples483x
930MXNvidiaBench 8%, 7,330 samples121x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples10x
SSD
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples61x
hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GBSKBench 111%, 5,344 samples53x
Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel  $65Bench 104%, 11,104 samples43x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples49x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples38x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples37x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback