Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 184
2-Core 367
109% 210 Pts
4-Core 732
8-Core 1,445
129% 1,088 Pts
64-Core 2,613
162% 2,613 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDPE2TB-D8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AAT7GD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1339 1348 1352 1345 1354 1350 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,454
Write 1,344
Mixed 1,125
SusWrite 1348
297% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 63.6
208% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,238
DQ Write 1072
DQ Mixed 648
624% 986 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 256%
Great: 382%
PNY CS3140 2TB SSD
944GB free
Firmware: CS314512
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4062 4129 4435 4481 4480 4487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
519% Outstanding
Read 2,670
Write 1,439
Mixed 3,123
SusWrite 4,345
655% 2,894 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 79.6
252% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,762
DQ Write 1,325
DQ Mixed 1,627
1,194% 1,571 MB/s
Poor: 246%
This bench: 519%
Great: 596%
SABRENT 1TB
631GB free
Firmware: RKT343.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2335 2366 1545 1113 1113 1107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
447GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 148 147 145 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 145
Write 116
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 147
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-5200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 49.1
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 47.2
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 44.9
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 42.4
128% 44.7 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 0" 1707 897
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback