Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 16:21
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 108
54% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 136
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
MSI(1462 2802) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 11.7
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 99 91 99 94 98 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 161
Write 82.2
Mixed 117
SusWrite 98.5
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 17.7
62% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 89.7
DQ Mixed 34.1
33% 50.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-708.A00LF BLT4G3D1337DT1TX0. KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 57.8" 1280 720 PHL0000 Philips FTV
Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback