Asus PRIME A520M-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-A II  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 05:51
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 309
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 939
96% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,038
64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 42.9
Parallax 40.3
36% 42.4 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 28.6
29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 349 348 352 356 360 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 351
Mixed 333
SusWrite 353
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 43.7
142% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 270
231% 338 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 4000 C20 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 30.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 27.4
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 11 60 22" 1680 979 HWP26A9 HP w2207
Typical PRIME A520M-A II Builds (Compare 506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback