Powerspec PowerSpec

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPowerspec PowerSpec  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z270 Gaming K6
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170206
Uptime238.9 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 23:40
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700k VH
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 138
2-Core 271
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 702
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 738
46% 738 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
MSI(1462 3177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1555 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 845DC EVO 480GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT03X3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 396 396 405 407 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 396
Mixed 262
SusWrite 399
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 37.1
136% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 264
215% 306 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2143 703 625 629 628 626 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2455
Write 2225
Mixed 1654
SusWrite 892
404% 1,807 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 73.5
240% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1030
770% 1,027 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 273%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 28
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 32.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 43.2" 1280 720 VIZ1009 D43n-E1
Typical PowerSpec Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Powerspec PowerSpec

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback