User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220916
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 23:18
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 170
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 288
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.7% Below average
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 52.3
27% 47.3 fps
MRender 57.4
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 40.9
37% 46.5 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 512G 512GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0523B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 973 1013 1023 1162 1102 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,576
Write 1,128
Mixed 976
SusWrite 883
255% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 24.7
129% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 461
DQ Mixed 300
248% 348 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 171%
Great: 229%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
342GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 75 80 73 83 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 477
Write 424
Mixed 346
SusWrite 125
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 27.4
101% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 187
170% 257 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD40826D19P1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.6% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 19.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 20 165 23.8" 1280 720 VIE2022 R200s
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback