Kllisre B75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardKllisre B75  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 172
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 460
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 8840) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.4% Very good
Lighting 97.4
Reflection 97
Parallax 89.3
79% 94.6 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 89.8
Splatting 75.8
71% 88 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kllisre 1TB 1TB
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103E0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 676 682 541 132 339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1133
Write 953
Mixed 768
SusWrite 504
188% 839 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 21.6
114% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 605
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 507
382% 516 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 133%
Great: 233%
SSD 1TB 1TB
694GB free
Firmware: FW210415
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 224 226 231 220 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 245
Write 224
Mixed 217
SusWrite 224
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 10.8
77% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 19
57% 122 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 209%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
375GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 121
Write 120
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 115
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
426GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 163 160 162 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 120
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 162
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kllisre D3 8G1600M 89C2 KRE-D3U1600M/8G 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 29 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G4
Typical B75 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Kllisre B75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback