Kllisre B75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardKllisre B75  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 22:46
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 177
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 411
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 8840) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (98 fps cap detected)
77% Very good
Lighting 98
Reflection 97.4
Parallax 97.7
80% 97.7 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 77.5
71% 88.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kllisre 1TB 1TB
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103E0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 365 130 207 131 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,132
Write 952
Mixed 759
SusWrite 281
174% 781 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 22.5
116% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 492
374% 509 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 120%
Great: 233%
SSD 1TB 1TB
694GB free
Firmware: FW210415
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 224 226 229 234 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.6% Above average
Read 249
Write 224
Mixed 218
SusWrite 226
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 11.9
80% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 19.1
57% 122 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 209%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
375GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 119 120 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 120
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
426GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 162 159 161 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 147
Mixed 69
SusWrite 161
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kllisre D3 8G1600M 89C2 KRE-D3U1600M/8G 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G4
Typical B75 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Kllisre B75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback