Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705GE
Memory	58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '23 at 20:06
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 84.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 235 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 645 67% 539 Pts	64-Core 803 50% 803 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 1B3E) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3118 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 41.2 Parallax 38.9 33% 40.1 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 41.8 Splatting 27.5 28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 874GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1477 1303 1287 1308 1293 1302 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 1,968 Write 1,972 Mixed 1,574 SusWrite 1,328 385% 1,711 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 56.6 174% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 616 DQ Write 508 DQ Mixed 582 430% 569 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 435%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 23GB free Firmware: JB0OA3V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 77 82 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 85.2 Write 91.1 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 78.4 50% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX64GX4M2A2666C18 2x31.5GB 658 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 25.2 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 24.4 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	17.3"	1280 720	AUO429D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	220x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	43x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	150x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	113x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	66x
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples	22x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	17x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	63x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	41x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16