Asus F2A85-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus F2A85-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141127
Uptime	30.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '23 at 17:04
Run Duration	346 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 75.4 41% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 143 17% 132 Pts	64-Core 121 8% 121 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70% Good	Lighting 96.8 Reflection 89.3 Parallax 78.8 79% 88.3 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 79.5 Splatting 51.8 53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 454GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 38 3.5 50 23 2.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 364 Write 283 Mixed 258 SusWrite 32.9 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 9.1 42% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 83.6 DQ Mixed 12.4 32% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 58%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 238GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 388 Write 12.4 Mixed 27.8 30% 143 MB/s	4K Read 108 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.6 168% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79 15,015 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 111GB free Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 93 103 79 92 102 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.7% Average	Read 241 Write 133 Mixed 171 SusWrite 92.3 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 21.4 63% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 121 103% 153 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 79%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$88 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 657GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 99 112 81 107 111 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 131 Write 91.1 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 99.7 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 87%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 298GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.8% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 32.6 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 8.6 34% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.1 86% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 298GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.2 9.2 8.8 9.1 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 32 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 9.1 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 21%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 163GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.61% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 28.8 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 1.4 24% 18 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 7.61% Great: 49%
WDC WD10 EAVS-32D7B1 1TB 28GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.08% Terrible	Read 30.4 Write 31 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 0 25% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 54% 0.8 MB/s

WDC WD64 00AAKS-00A7B2 640GB 269GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.43% Terrible	Read 27.4 Write 30.7 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 0.1 27% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 59% 0.93 MB/s

Lexar SD WorkflowUR2 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 57GB free, PID ba0f Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 21.1 Write 26 Mixed 25.2 32% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 3.7 253% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 49%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 125GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 32.2 Write 33.7 Mixed 30.8 42% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 76% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 59GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 32.4 Write 33.7 Mixed 30.9 42% 32.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 225GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 49.7 Write 29.9 Mixed 28.1 42% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 79% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 218GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 27.3 Write 29.1 Mixed 26.9 36% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 CT102464BA160B.M16 CT102464BA1339.M16 CT102464BA160B.C16 32GB 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.9% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 10.1 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 9.7 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	30	9	30	36.1"	1280 720	CTV1086 SE55UET

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A85-V PRO Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V PRO - $165

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	25x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	18x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	10x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	9x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CF8 Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 M378B5673FH0-CF8 M378B5673FH0-CF8 12GBSamsungBench 29%, 18 samples	8x
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 43%, 130 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $284

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16