Gigabyte GA-Z590 GAMING X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220124
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 07:35
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600KF-$118
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 270
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 861
83% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2261 813 805 805 805 799 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,570
Write 2,367
Mixed 1,778
SusWrite 1,048
434% 1,941 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 72.7
237% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1202
DQ Write 985
DQ Mixed 1,105
824% 1,098 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 289%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
350GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2269 776 782 780 783 784 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,548
Write 2,382
Mixed 1,774
SusWrite 1,029
433% 1,933 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 76
241% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 1277
DQ Write 1,040
DQ Mixed 1,156
866% 1,158 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 292%
Great: 346%
WDC WD32 00AAKX-001CA0 320GB
269GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 127 127 127 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 126
140% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%
WDC WD32 00AAKX-001CA0 320GB
231GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 71
SusWrite 91.7
126% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB
298GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 96 98 96 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
Read 97.2
Write 47.9
Mixed 36.1
SusWrite 95.4
88% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%
WDC WD32 00AAKX-001CA0 320GB
50GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 97 98 96 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
Read 97.8
Write 92.7
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 95.3
118% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 20
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 GAMING X Builds (Compare 4,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback