ECS H110M4-C43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H110M4-C43  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 16:24
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 186
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 353
46% 350 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69% Good
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 88.9
Parallax 76.4
74% 85.3 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 72.2
59% 72.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Ghost M.2 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 430
Write 353
Mixed 220
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.5
30% 8.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 76%
Memory Ghost SSD 240GB
52GB free
Firmware: U0326A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 354 236 96 102 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 443
Write 368
Mixed 141
SusWrite 192
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 2
75% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 2.1
60% 138 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
132GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 100 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 80.3
Write 80.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 100
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 50%
FNK TECH USB CARD READER 16GB
7GB free, PID 0300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15.7
Write 14.4
Mixed 15
19% 15 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4
278% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 21.5" 1920 1017 DELA0D9 DELL P2217H
Typical H110M4-C43 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H110M4-C43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback