HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231016
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 15:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 184
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 546
53% 435 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 37.4
29% 37.4 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 26.2
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GO INFINITY-512GB 512GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 376 252 78 102 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 434
Write 352
Mixed 344
SusWrite 209
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 22.9
109% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 45
84% 163 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU7AFR8N-UH HMA82GU7CJR8N-VK 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 21.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 5R 5G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 13% 102 211 59 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0659 SAMSUNG
Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback