HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '23 at 15:10
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115 20,482 User benchmarks, average bench 44% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 52.2 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 71.4 34% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 122 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400 1,018 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 0893) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.23 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 1.6 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 102 106 113 118 104 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.2% Below average	Read 206 Write 130 Mixed 150 SusWrite 109 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 6.6 50% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 88.1 DQ Write 97.3 DQ Mixed 119 82% 101 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F 44GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 5.1 17% 6.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	27	16	60	24"	1280 720	ACR0289 S240HL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	53x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	26x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	90x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	20x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	17x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:01 98 K1N7HK-HYC 48GBUnknownBench 19%, 8 samples	6x
ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 38GBUnknownBench 20%, 147 samples	5x
ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 38GBUnknownBench 19%, 31 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16